Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2012 12:40:15 GMT -5
1 YEAR 25 MILLION W/OP FOR 2ND YEAR
|
|
|
|
Post by awilliams on Nov 18, 2012 12:50:49 GMT -5
How much more til silent bidding? lol
1 year 25.3M
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2012 13:54:03 GMT -5
I'm out this is stupid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2012 14:23:41 GMT -5
1 year @ $26 mil + option year
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 18, 2012 23:26:37 GMT -5
23m was the limit. Victorino will move to silent bidding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 21, 2012 23:08:15 GMT -5
Mariners wins the bid with 2 years @ 14m.
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Jared) on Nov 21, 2012 23:25:43 GMT -5
Shouldn't the silent bidding have to be more than what the public bidding ended at?!?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2012 5:46:01 GMT -5
Umm - absolutely! The highest bid should win - regardless of which stage of bidding it came in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 22, 2012 9:59:04 GMT -5
Well, this hasn't been a rule so far... I think it makes sense, but we'd have to redo players.
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Jared) on Nov 22, 2012 10:20:49 GMT -5
Has this happened before where a silent bidder won for more than the public bidding was? That just makes no sense to let the silent bidder for that amount when Victorino reached that amount in the first like 5 hours of bidding.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 22, 2012 11:45:54 GMT -5
Guys, I definitely agree with you, but I really don't have the motivation to argue with you anymore, we'll fix it for the future... I don't have the time, the want to, or the desire to go through and redo all of the bids. Let's remember this is a fantasy baseball league, and we can make changes as we go along. Okay? I think everyone tends to freak out when something doesn't go there way, keep it in perspective. I only got one silent bid, and people had 48 hours to do something that took a couple of minutes.
Let's just move on, someone can post a suggestion if they want to, and if it's voted on, which we always do, then I will adjust the rules. Thanks...
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Jared) on Nov 22, 2012 12:02:26 GMT -5
Trust me you would have had a lot more bids if we knew that you didn't have to place a bid above the amount that sent him to silent bidding
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2012 13:02:17 GMT -5
I thought bidding higher was just something you automatically did haha
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2012 14:49:45 GMT -5
Exactly - if I knew I could bid below the highest bid I would have. You've got nothing to lose and everything to win. I just didn't know it was possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 22, 2012 18:59:13 GMT -5
Well, I've gotten tons of bids like that during bidding... if we want to make this a rule someone post a suggestion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 24, 2012 12:29:27 GMT -5
Brewers Accept.
Official.
|
|
