Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Vetoing
Nov 10, 2011 18:11:09 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2011 18:11:09 GMT -5
Something in this league needs to change about vetoes. 1/4 of the trades in this league are vetoed...that's an insane ratio!
And now people are vetoing because their trades are getting vetoed!
No, this doesn't have to do with the vetoes on my deal, I've noticed this over time...I mean, how are teams supposed to improve if their trades are shot down a lot!
I truly believe a trade can only be vetoed if it's absolutely awful or collusion can be proved.
Sorry for the spiel, guess I'm cranky tonight haha
|
|
|
|
Vetoing
Nov 10, 2011 19:20:49 GMT -5
Post by philliesgm on Nov 10, 2011 19:20:49 GMT -5
You're right Michael. Most of the time when people veto and post why they veto it's because THEY would not do the deal. Well, isn't that obvious and the reason why the team took the other deal? My reason for my first veto ever is because I truly felt that the White Sox renigged on an already accepted trade to take a lesser trade (my opinion) because of how strong my team is, and that is wrong. You are correct in that the vetoes are getting outrageous. They went to tarde committee one time, but then everyone got pissed because they were not on the committe. I was like WOW when I saw that.
|
|
|
|
Vetoing
Nov 10, 2011 20:32:30 GMT -5
Post by Jacob (Former Tigers GM) on Nov 10, 2011 20:32:30 GMT -5
Leave names out guys.
|
|
|
|
Vetoing
Nov 10, 2011 20:53:14 GMT -5
Post by whitesoxgm on Nov 10, 2011 20:53:14 GMT -5
I would NEVER EVER not make a trade because I thought a team was getting to good. Thats not the right way to play.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Vetoing
Nov 13, 2011 3:03:34 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2011 3:03:34 GMT -5
You know, it's interesting to see who complains about vetoes. It's not teams that are on the short end(because they usually rework the deal and get more or get a better offer from someone else), it's teams who are getting a huge return simply because they made the first offer.
Ok, so maybe you think it's unfair because you feel like you have the right to players when the other guys agrees to a deal, but if you really want a player, then make a better offer or make a good offer to start with... not one of those lowball offers I can't believe the other guy actually accepted.
Teams who are getting the short end of the stick are helped out by the rules, and I don't think the job of the trade review should be to make it that good teams get even better or that inexperienced managers get fleeced.
Leave it as is... and make better offers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Vetoing
Nov 13, 2011 7:58:56 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2011 7:58:56 GMT -5
Uhh...if you're talking about my deals with Alex, HE made the offers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Vetoing
Nov 13, 2011 8:25:35 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2011 8:25:35 GMT -5
I'm makin this into too big of a deal. It's just a free fantasy league. Let's drop it  |
|
|
|
Vetoing
Nov 13, 2011 9:59:39 GMT -5
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 13, 2011 9:59:39 GMT -5
Thanks Michael  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Vetoing
Nov 13, 2011 13:51:22 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Nov 13, 2011 13:51:22 GMT -5
I'm makin this into too big of a deal. It's just a free fantasy league. Let's drop it I don't think you're making it into a big deal at all. I think all of us in this league welcome discussion about how we can make this league better. |
|
