Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2011 21:35:08 GMT -5
Twins Recieve
- Bobby Parnell $0.4 3-4 years until arb
- 1st Rd Pick (pick 17)
Nats Recieve
- Joe Nathan 12.5 mil
I accept because i am rebuilding and need the 1st rd pick.
Joe Nathan should do really well for Texas this year tho
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2011 21:42:49 GMT -5
accept, i need a good closer bad, and Nathan to texas only increases his value. nice working with you Kyle
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2011 21:53:23 GMT -5
Pass
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2011 22:20:42 GMT -5
Veto, Nathan alone isn't worth a first round pick in myopinion
|
|
|
|
Post by Orioles GM (Michael) on Nov 21, 2011 23:12:42 GMT -5
Agreed. Nathan is worth less in Texas because of their solid options other than Nathan. He would've been more valuable in Minnesota where he'll actually close.
Veto
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2011 23:50:07 GMT -5
Approve
I wouldn't do it... especially considering Parnell will probably close for Mets and is controlled for longer, but it's anybody's guess as to who'll be better this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orioles GM (Michael) on Nov 21, 2011 23:58:13 GMT -5
Well, no, feliz is movin to the rotation. So you're misinformes. But, you're correct about the hitters park thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2011 2:42:45 GMT -5
Well, no, feliz is movin to the rotation. So you're misinformes. But, you're correct about the hitters park thing. With that money the Rangers are giving Nathan, there is no way he won't be closing when it comes the start of the season. And this talk about him clsosing in a pitchers park is pure speculation. Who are we to know if he's going to be good/bad there? Can't say he is until he actually shows. Can't veto a trade based on one's speculation. And as far as the trade itself goes, as Slava said, I wouldn't accept this deal in my own case, but I can see why somebody else would. Nathan is a proven comoddity coming off an injured season, who actually got better as the season went on. Parnell on the other hadn, although having the skills capable of closing, is no proven commodity, and although may be handed the closer's job to start next year, there is no track history there to show how good he'll be. Combine this with the fact that nathan will be pitching for a better team, which would mean more saves, and the fact that Pete is trying for it next year while Kyle is rebuilding is enough for me. Rant over, that is all. I still approve by the way! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 22, 2011 5:47:49 GMT -5
plus the Rangers actually win games...more saves and Parnell doesn't even have the Mets job yet...not a long term thing
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 22, 2011 6:50:07 GMT -5
Approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Bill) on Nov 22, 2011 8:02:43 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Braves GM (Jared) on Nov 22, 2011 10:21:54 GMT -5
approve
|
|
|
|
Post by philliesgm on Nov 22, 2011 10:42:56 GMT -5
Approve. Speculation is just that, speculation. Their teams let them manage.
|
|
|
|
Post by fogle429 on Nov 22, 2011 17:56:08 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by marlinsgmhj on Nov 23, 2011 3:48:27 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 23, 2011 10:15:13 GMT -5
Official.
|
|
