|
|
Post by whitesoxgm on Nov 29, 2011 7:55:02 GMT -5
White Sox Get:
SP Jordan Lyles, HOU, 400k
Cubs Get:
1B/3B/OF Dayan Viceido, CWS, 400k
CWS 4th round pick
Cubs to accept...
|
|
|
|
Post by jon on Nov 29, 2011 8:40:04 GMT -5
Cubbies Accept. WE LOVE DAYAN! Though it hurts to lose a young pitcher in Lyles, We think Dayan will contribute more to the team and has the potential to be a star. Lets hope he becomes a stud!!
Thanks Alex, good working with you and of course, best of luck to you!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 29, 2011 19:52:47 GMT -5
approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Nov 29, 2011 20:15:19 GMT -5
Approve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orioles GM (Michael) on Nov 29, 2011 21:52:50 GMT -5
approve
|
|
|
|
Post by fogle429 on Nov 30, 2011 3:11:25 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Derrick) on Nov 30, 2011 3:55:20 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2011 17:13:10 GMT -5
Veto, I think that Dayan is better than Lyles, and throw in a 4th???
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2011 17:46:10 GMT -5
I agree that Vaceido is the more intriguing prospect at this point, which is curious that he would throw in a 4th on top of him for Lyles. However, due to the nature of prospects' stocks jumping up and down all the time, we can't definitively say this is a bad or good deal. So...
approve
|
|
|
|
Post by whitesoxgm on Nov 30, 2011 17:55:06 GMT -5
I need SP help, and Lyles should be a mainstay for many years. Pluse, I got Cox+Sano for 3rd base.
|
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Bill) on Dec 1, 2011 8:27:19 GMT -5
I agree with Slava; Viciedo is the guy I'd rather have, but the Sox are filling a need with Lyles. Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by jon on Dec 1, 2011 8:35:35 GMT -5
The point of a trade committee is to not veto trades because it is a little lopsided, but to veto trades that obviously represent Collusion. One player may be better than the other but that does not mean a trade should get vetoed. but that might just be me. anyways the trade looks like its gonna get passed  yupee |
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Dec 1, 2011 8:46:09 GMT -5
Official.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 1, 2011 22:57:16 GMT -5
The point of a trade committee is to not veto trades because it is a little lopsided, but to veto trades that obviously represent Collusion. One player may be better than the other but that does not mean a trade should get vetoed. but that might just be me. anyways the trade looks like its gonna get passed yupee If all owners were in the league on a permanent basis or if this was a one season league, I'd agree. But look at the mess the pirates (and you to a certain extent) have taken over - that's why we veto. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2011 16:28:29 GMT -5
Just go back to all the trades from when this league first started, now that the seasons over and we can see how those players performed look how lopsided some of the deals were, somebody got Ellsbury for next to nothing I believe
|
|
yupee