|
|
Post by reyalmanza on Jul 3, 2012 23:41:23 GMT -5
Pirates get:
Manny Machado Minor
White sox get:
Paul Maholm SP 12:0.5 13:0.5 14:0.5
Levi Michael Minor
Rudy Owens Minor
2.1
|
|
|
|
Post by glarsen1227 on Jul 3, 2012 23:42:16 GMT -5
i accept
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 10:17:12 GMT -5
Veto, Machado is a top 5 spect, Michael has sucked, Maholm is decent but not great, and Rudy Owens stinks, the 2 spects are not top 120. 2.1 is a great pick but doesn't fufill the difference.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 10:30:50 GMT -5
approve
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 13:05:42 GMT -5
woah i pleed the 5th
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 13:14:59 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 13:15:33 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Bill) on Jul 4, 2012 14:48:06 GMT -5
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Jacob (Former Tigers GM) on Jul 4, 2012 15:21:53 GMT -5
VETO. Machado is a great prospect with a chance of becoming a great SS for a dynasty. Maholm is awful this year, White Sox will likely miss with that pick, because he has a good chance too. The spects aren't good at all. This is an awful trad, VETO.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex) on Jul 4, 2012 15:23:32 GMT -5
I approve, white sox gets depth with this deal, machado could very well be a bust.
|
|
|
|
Post by mrmetsman on Jul 4, 2012 16:48:56 GMT -5
Maholm may be an average starter,he is a workhorse.
In a league that scores points for "innings pitched" that counts for something.
Together with K's and Wins?? he makes a decent starter.
Michael may have had a tough start,but we must not forget he was a 1st round pick and he is very young and already playing at A+ where he normally would be in rookieball.In 2 years he could very well be a top 30 prospect.
Owens is also still very young and already at AAA where he made a significant improvement in his second year at this level.
A trend with him cause he did that at every level he played.
It tells me he learns/improves quick and it wouldn't surprise me if he got called up very soon.
That together with pick #31 is a decent haul for 1 prospect.
Even though it's a top 10 prospect.
Could he get a better deal?
Maybe,but this one isn't bad at all.
Both can become winners in this deal.
Well Done.
Approve
|
|
|
|
Post by Angels GM (Derrick) on Jul 7, 2012 4:02:44 GMT -5
(5-2) Official....teams should now make the corresponding roster moves to reflect this trade. GoogleDocs will be updated in the near future, once they are this post will be moved to the official trades thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2012 20:47:14 GMT -5
Docs are updated, please proceed to make all of the corresponding roster moves.
|
|
